November 22nd, 2010

#2414: TSA considers incredibly stupid policy.

Via Alan Caruba I get this:
Now the Council on American-Islamic Relations, CAIR, wants special procedures for screening Muslim women so they can avoid pat-downs and reportedly Homeland Security is considering letting them pat themselves down!

Muslim terrorists are the entire reason the TSA says we all have to be patted down and examined and screened and x-rayed and groped: all these measures are meant to prevent people from bringing bombs aboard aircraft.

Caruba makes the point that it was islamic terrorists who tried bringing bombs aboard airplanes, and I want to add that only the incompetence of the would-be bombers prevented these islamic atrocities from killing anyone.

This being the case, why the motherfucking hell should MUSLIMS get a free pass from TSA?

If muslims get to "pat themselves down I had better be allowed to do the same, because if I can't, that amounts to:

1) government respecting an establishment of religion, which violates the First Amendment
2) a violation of the principle of "equal treatment under the law" as enumerated in the Fourteenth Amendment.

* * *

Al Gore admits that corn ethanol is greenie bullshit.

* * *

Another blow stricken for civil rights!

I find it hard to believe that the arresting officer didn't know what the freaking law was. But a cop doesn't falsely arrest someone, illegally search him, and confiscate his property, without thinking he's either enforcing the law, or above it.

And it's no secret that plenty of cops absolutely detest the idea of citizens being allowed to own and carry firearms.

Everything the cop did in that instance was wrong. If he doesn't know the law, he for damn sure shouldn't be allowed to enforce the law. He ought to be fired, or at least sent back to the police academy for remedial training in the freakin' law.

* * *

Serious flight-sim nerd alert. It's really cool, though.

* * *

Wear a kilt like a true Scotsman for your next flight!

...technically this is punishing the guys down in the trenches for a policy set by the Oval Orofice, but the more unpleasant the pat-downs become for the screeners, it increases reluctance of the screeners to do them--and you end up with incredibly long lines at the checkpoints. Pretty soon you have the airlines screaming at the TSA over their on-time performance etc, etc.

And that's what we want: we want the airlines to scream at the TSA. If the airlines get mad enough, they'll force airports to kick out the TSA and bring in private security.

* * *

Incidentally, does anyone know what the lefties are saying about this?

I would expect them to say, "All right! The American people are finally waking up to the realities of Bushitler's Patriot Act!"

But I don't think they're saying that; I think they're saying, "Don't those idiots know that the TSA is just trying to keep them safe?" Because their guy is in charge.

"That's what you're doing!" You may say, incorrectly. "You were fine with the TSA when Bushitler was in office!"

The TSA wasn't using full-body scanners nor was it groping people (and strip-searching children) when Bush was in office.

I was fine with the security protocols put in place after 9/11. I traveled by air in 2002, 2007, 2008, and 2009, and did not consider the scans and such to be excessive. They were really just enhanced versions of the kind of security measures undertaken before 9/11. They x-ray your luggage and have you walk through a metal detector--no biggie, IMHO, as for the most part that's all they did prior to 9/11. Some things get a little extra attention (like my old Inspiron 9000--it got swabbed).

But the scanner/pat-down/strip-search protocol they're doing now is far too invasive. The idea of the pat-down is to make people opt for the scanner; they want everyone to walk through the scanners because they're faster than the pat-down. The idea is to make the invasive search quick and easy, thus not inconveniencing people, because the cattle won't stampede if they're not inconvenienced.

Meanwhile, none of this would have stopped the pantybomber or the shoebomber, because they didn't have enough metal on their persons to set off the metal detectors and the body scanner looks right through nonmetallic objects.

Do you still have to take your shoes off before you walk through the scanner? Do you still have to take all the stuff out of your pockets and run it through the x-ray machine? Limbaugh says "yes" and I don't expect the TSA will rely just on the body scanners since it's not invasive enough.

* * *

If we really want to stop these people, we need to profile.

* * *

More extremely crappy science reporting: "Boring into the bed of the Dead Sea, the group of engineers and scientists began extracting layers of the earth's core...."

Reuters can't afford to hire reporters that understand the difference between a core sample and the core of the planet?
They will drill a five-cm-wide hole, which is much smaller than those used to find oil, and not stop until they reach 500 meters....
So there you have it: the Earth's core is 500 meters down. Reuters says so!


This is, of course, why the mainstream media uncritically accepts anthropogenic global warming: they're all a bunch of ignorant fools.

* * *

Anyway, I'm starving. I'm-a gonna go get me a bacon motherfucker or something.

#2415: An excerpt from Piper's utopia

Lone Star Planet:
"The general nature of the case," the judge was saying, "is that the defendant, Wilbur Whately, of Sam Houston Continent, is here charged with divers offenses arising from the death of the Honorable S. Austin Maverick, whom he killed on the front steps of the Legislative Assembly Building, here in New Austin...."

What goes on here? I thought angrily. This is the rankest instance of a pre-judged case I've ever seen. I started to say as much to Gail, but she hushed me.

"I want to hear the specifications," she said.

A man at the prosecution table had risen.

"Please the court," he began, "the defendant, Wilbur Whately, is here charged with political irresponsibility and excessive atrocity in exercising his constitutional right of criticism of a practicing politician.

"The specifications are, as follows: That, on the afternoon of May Seventh, Anno Domini 2193, the defendant here present did arm himself with a machete, said machete not being one of his normal and accustomed weapons, and did loiter in wait on the front steps of the Legislative Assembly Building in the city of New Austin, Continent of Sam Houston, and did approach the decedent, addressing him in abusive, obscene, and indecent language, and did set upon and attack him with the machete aforesaid, causing the said decedent, S. Austin Maverick, to die."

The court wanted to know how the defendant would plead. Somebody, without bothering to rise, said, "Not guilty, Your Honor," from the defense table.

There was a brief scraping of chairs; four of five men from the defense and the prosecution tables got up and advanced to confer in front of the bench, comparing sheets of paper. The man who had read the charges, obviously the chief prosecutor, made himself the spokesman.

"Your Honor, defense and prosecution wish to enter the following stipulations: That the decedent was a practicing politician within the meaning of the Constitution, that he met his death in the manner stated in the coroner's report, and that he was killed by the defendant, Wilbur Whately."

"Is that agreeable to you, Mr. Vincent?" the judge wanted to know.

The defense answered affirmatively. I sat back, gaping like a fool. Why, that was practically--no, it was--a confession.

"All right, gentlemen," the judge said. "Now we have all that out of the way, let's get on with the case."

As though there were any case to get on with! I fully expected them to take it on from there in song, words by Gilbert and music by Sullivan.

"Well, Your Honor, we have a number of character witnesses," the prosecution--prosecution, for God's sake!--announced.

"Skip them," the defense said. "We stipulate."

"But you can't stipulate character testimony," the prosecution argued. "You don't know what our witnesses are going to testify to."

"Sure we do: they're going to give us a big long shaggy-dog story about the Life and Miracles of Saint Austin Maverick. We'll agree in advance to all that; this case is concerned only with his record as a politician. And as he spent the last fifteen years in the Senate, that's all a matter of public record. I assume that the prosecution is going to introduce all that, too?"

"Well, naturally ..." the prosecutor began.

"Including his public acts on the last day of his life?" the counsel for the defense demanded. "His actions on the morning of May seventh as chairman of the Finance and Revenue Committee? You going to introduce that as evidence for the prosecution?"

"Well, now ..." the prosecutor began.

"Your Honor, we ask to have a certified copy of the proceedings of the Senate Finance and Revenue Committee for the morning of May Seventh, 2193, read into the record of this court," the counsel for the defense said. "And thereafter, we rest our case."

"Has the prosecution anything to say before we close the court?" Judge Nelson inquired.

"Well, Your Honor, this seems ... that is, we ought to hear both sides of it. My old friend, Aus Maverick, was really a fine man; he did a lot of good for the people of his continent...."

"Yeah, we'd of lynched him, when he got back, if somebody hadn't chopped him up here in New Austin!" a voice from the rear of the courtroom broke in.

The prosecution hemmed and hawed for a moment, and then announced, in a hasty mumble, that it rested.

"I will now close the court," Judge Nelson said. "I advise everybody to keep your seats. I don't think it's going to be closed very long."

And then, he actually closed the court; pressing a button on the bench, he raised a high black screen in front of him and his colleagues. It stayed up for some sixty seconds, and then dropped again.

"The Court of Political Justice has reached a verdict," he announced. "Wilbur Whately, and your attorney, approach and hear the verdict."

The defense lawyer motioned a young man who had been sitting beside him to rise. In the silence that had fallen, I could hear the defendant's boots squeaking as he went forward to hear his fate. The judge picked up a belt and a pair of pistols that had been lying in front of him.

"Wilbur Whately," he began, "this court is proud to announce that you have been unanimously acquitted of the charge of political irresponsibility, and of unjustified and excessive atrocity.

"There was one dissenting vote on acquitting you of the charge of political irresponsibility; one of the associate judges felt that the late unmitigated scoundrel, Austin Maverick, ought to have been skinned alive, an inch at a time. You are, however, acquitted of that charge, too.

"You all know," he continued, addressing the entire assemblage, "the reason for which this young hero cut down that monster of political iniquity, S. Austin Maverick. On the very morning of his justly-merited death, Austin Maverick, using the powers of his political influence, rammed through the Finance and Revenue Committee a bill entitled 'An Act for the Taxing of Personal Incomes, and for the Levying of a Withholding Tax.' Fellow citizens, words fail me to express my horror of this diabolic proposition, this proposed instrument of tyrannical extortion, borrowed from the Dark Ages of the Twentieth Century! Why, if this young nobleman had not taken his blade in hand, I'd have killed the sonofabitch, myself!"

He leaned forward, extending the belt and holsters to the defendant.

"I therefore restore to you your weapons, taken from you when, in compliance with the law, you were formally arrested. Buckle them on, and, assuming your weapons again, go forth from this court a free man, Wilbur Whately. And take with you that machete with which you vindicated the liberties and rights of all New Texans. Bear it reverently to your home, hang it among your lares and penates, cherish it, and dying, mention it within your will, bequeathing it as a rich legacy unto your issue! Court adjourned; next session 0900 tomorrow. For Chrissake, let's get out of here before the barbecue's over!"
I want to live there. The goddamned politicians ought to live in fear of the ire of their constituents.