The Associate Press (AP) did not mention the fact that the five-year old offered up for molestation was black. Bringing that fact to light might be damaging to the political coalition that exists between blacks and gays. Nor did the AP mention that the adopted child is being raised by a homosexual couple. Bringing that fact to light might harm the gay adoption movement.If you look at the statistics you find that a disproportionate number of homosexuals are child molestors. I can't remember the exact figures but it is a striking number when compared to heterosexual pedophiles.
This is a pretty heinous thing. Will it be reported with the same fervor as the previous Duke rape case? Or will MSM sweep it under the rug as quickly as possible?
(By the way, the canard, "he's not gay; he's a pedophile" won't work here. The man is openly gay.)
I'll tell you what'll happen: the story will be swept under the rug. If the MSM has anything at all to say about it, it'll disappear. It just doesn't fit the "template".
The comments at Michelle Malkin's site bring up a lot of good points.
Aother take on the story. I hope his closing comment is right, that this story won't stay buried.
But I won't hold my breath.
