atomic_fungus (atomic_fungus) wrote,
atomic_fungus
atomic_fungus

#3508: This is insane.

AoSHQ has the news that there will be three Hobbit films.

Why do there need to be three? Let's face it: The Hobbit is essentially a stand-alone story. While it contains the setup for the Lord of the Rings trilogy, you don't need to read LoTR in order to get The Hobbit. The reverse is also true; if you don't read The Hobbit before reading LoTR you're none the worse for wear.

Yet it sounds to me as if they're piling Silmarillion into The Hobbit and making a huge f-ing trilogy out of it, and it's just so unnecessary.

The more I hear about this shit, the more I'm thinking I'll just buy the DVDs when they come out. Shit.

* * *

Victor Davis Hanson has another piece on how California has turned into a third-world country.

As always, California is on the leading edge of where we're headed...if we're not careful.

* * *

As for me, I was originally going to play some WoW after a quick surf, but ended up writing this discussion of nuclear power on Pennock's Fiero Forum.

What can I say?

Subscribe

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 0 comments